
Singapore's Frontier-AI Mandate: An Action Plan for the Board
Singapore's latest cyber direction should not be read as just another compliance update. It is a board-level evidence problem. Here's what CSA's Frontier-AI dir...
Trusted by leading technology companies worldwide.
Proof system
Versioned benchmarks, public traces, and coordinated disclosures make our work inspectable.
As of August 2026, FailSafe SWARM holds the highest reported score on CVE-Bench v2.1.0: 62.5% zero-day and 70% one-day at pass@1 (28 of 40 targets), graded by a deterministic oracle with results published under MIT.
Check the evidenceFailSafe's AttackBench, developed with NEAR, ran 624 hostile exchanges between an attacker model and defending AI agents across three runtimes.
Check the evidenceFailSafe has disclosed 240+ vulnerabilities across 101 coordinated reports, including findings at Deutsche Bank, MUFG, Zurich Insurance, and Vercel.
Check the evidenceAI agents that continuously discover, exploit, and validate vulnerabilities. Every finding is proven exploitable and mapped to MITRE ATT&CK and OWASP.
How It WorksLaunch a pentest in minutes and get validated findings with an audit-ready report the same day.
Every issue is proven and reproducible, with clear remediation your team can act on immediately.
Generated reports are explicitly mapped to the controls your auditors care about.
“By 2028, over 60% of enterprise pen test programs will operate as continuous validation, replacing annual assessments as the primary proof of resilience.”
Continuous offensive security testing for LLM integrations, autonomous agents, MCP tools, and ML pipelines. Mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, and CTEM workflows.
Explore AI securityThe FailSafe Disclosure Program publishes safe summaries of coordinated vulnerabilities and upstream security contributions, helping make the systems everyone builds on safer.
Explore the Disclosure ProgramContinuous penetration testing for APIs, web apps, and cloud infrastructure. Findings mapped to MITRE ATT&CK and OWASP Top 10.
Explore the security frontier
Choose a focused path into FailSafe's ACOST practice, research, and AI security work.
Test the tool, trust, permission, and supply-chain boundaries around AI agents.
ExploreCompare agentic pentesting and CTEM platforms by evidence, coverage, and operating model.
ExploreApply FailSafe's blockchain security heritage where financial and digital-asset risk is highest.
Explore
Singapore's latest cyber direction should not be read as just another compliance update. It is a board-level evidence problem. Here's what CSA's Frontier-AI dir...

Citadelle Defence & Security Consultancy and FailSafe announce a strategic partnership to deliver Digital Security & Resilience Services....

FailSafe conducted a comprehensive full-stack security audit for MakeBanc, hardening their smart contracts and off-chain backend orchestration services....
Trusted by MSSPs and system integrators to deliver continuous offensive security at scale.
Explore the partner programTalk to our security team about a tailored audit and protection strategy for your stack.
Questions & answers
Quick answers about FailSafe's services, coverage, and engagement process.
FailSafe Security is a cyber frontier lab building Agentic Continuous Offensive Security Testing (ACOST) systems for the AI era. It combines GlassBreak cyber-model R&D, SWARM agentic execution, CTEM workflows, human-led security research, and targeted security assessments for critical systems.
FailSafe offers ACOST and CTEM through SWARM; AI and agent security assessments; penetration testing for applications, APIs, and infrastructure; code assurance; incident response; compliance guidance; and security research.
FailSafe works across AI and agentic systems, web applications, APIs, cloud infrastructure, identity, data, and other critical software systems. Specialized code and financial-system work remains available when the threat model requires it.
Organizations can start a security scan or contact the FailSafe team with their scope, environment, and timeline. The team then recommends an assessment or continuous validation approach suited to the system.