Own your data and inference
Choose sovereign hosting and fully local inference. In that configuration, sensitive workloads, model processing and evidence stay inside your enterprise environment, with no external model calls.
SWARM™AGENTICPENTESTING
Test applications and AI systems with CVE-Bench-tested agents. For an agreed connected engagement, move from testing to remediation pull requests within 48 hours of access and integration readiness. Choose managed SaaS or sovereign hosting and local inference.
SWARM connects authorized attack-path testing to reproduced findings, engineering handoff and remediation retesting. Government, military and critical infrastructure teams can explore dedicated regional hosting or customer-operated deployment with local GlassBreak inference, subject to their requirements.
First-time Startup offer: $999 USD for 250 credits and one black-box run. Sign in before checkout.
Why FailSafe
Agentic pentesting with control over data and inference.
Start with FailSafe-managed SaaS, or explore sovereign options for government, military and critical infrastructure workloads. Choose where SWARM runs, where evidence is held and where FailSafe’s cyber models process it.
Findings your engineers can reproduce
See how a weakness can be used, what it affects, and what to change. Included evidence helps your engineers reproduce the finding and verify remediation.
AI systems in the test scope
Follow the path from a prompt or retrieved document into tools, identities, APIs, and business actions. Agree the specific surfaces and actions before testing.
FailSafe-trained cyber models
GlassBreak Flash V3 is security-post-trained by FailSafe and paired with SWARM’s active testing. Evaluate the model and execution workflow together on your application.
From finding to remediation PR
Connect reproduced findings to ITSM and let agents open remediation PRs with authorized source access. Your engineers review and merge changes; retest the path after the correction.
Enterprise deployments define the complete inference, egress, telemetry and support boundary. Custom hosting, ITSM and code-remediation integrations are scoped separately from the first-pentest promotion.
Illustrative product walkthrough: demo.test hosts, identities, findings and workflow states below are synthetic examples. Coverage, approvals and integrations depend on the agreed deployment and scope.
Attacker has reached the objectivedc01.corp.test → admin@DC01 (Domain Admin)
View path ›Remediation playbook generatedadmin@DC01 (DA) · Patch LDAP anonymous bind, rotate credentials
Open ›01 / Discover
Map the authorized attack surface
SWARM agents discover domains, APIs and exposed services within your authorized scope. Agree the inventory, access and testing cadence, then investigate the paths that matter to your systems.
02 / Exploit
Investigate and reproduce the finding
Agents investigate attack paths and preserve evidence of demonstrated impact. Reports distinguish reproduced findings from unverified observations and record the access, scope and limitations.
03 / Remediate
Connect findings to reviewed fixes
Validated findings can enter your agreed ITSM and remediation workflow. With authorized source access, agents can propose pull requests; your engineers review changes and approve rollout before retesting.
01 / Discover
Map the authorized attack surface
SWARM agents discover domains, APIs and exposed services within your authorized scope. Agree the inventory, access and testing cadence, then investigate the paths that matter to your systems.
02 / Exploit
Investigate and reproduce the finding
Agents investigate attack paths and preserve evidence of demonstrated impact. Reports distinguish reproduced findings from unverified observations and record the access, scope and limitations.
03 / Remediate
Connect findings to reviewed fixes
Validated findings can enter your agreed ITSM and remediation workflow. With authorized source access, agents can propose pull requests; your engineers review changes and approve rollout before retesting.
Attacker has reached the objectivedc01.corp.test → admin@DC01 (Domain Admin)
View path ›Remediation playbook generatedadmin@DC01 (DA) · Patch LDAP anonymous bind, rotate credentials
Open ›Platform
Investigation and remediation, connected.
01
Continuous Asset Discovery
Discover assets within your authorized scope.
SWARM can enumerate in-scope domains, APIs and exposed services, then track changes at the agreed cadence. Coverage depends on configured targets, access and the environment. Confirm how newly discovered assets are authorized before active testing.
- Open port detection with service and version fingerprinting
- Automatic risk classification as assets are discovered
- Change tracking: know when new infrastructure appears or configurations drift
02
Automated Remediation Workflows
Reproduce the finding. Review the fix. Retest the path.
Connect validated findings to an agreed ticketing and remediation workflow. With authorized integrations, agents can propose code changes and retest the relevant path. Your team controls approval and deployment; temporary mitigations require explicit authorization.
- Auto-generated tickets in Jira, ServiceNow, or Linear with full exploit context
- Pre-built playbooks for WAF rules, config patches, and access controls
- Automated re-testing verifies the fix worked before closing the ticket
Critical vulnerability detected
Illustrative approved workflow
Verified and resolved
03
Continuous Threat Intelligence
Know when your environment changes. Test before attackers do.
Configure alerts and targeted retesting for agreed infrastructure changes or relevant published vulnerabilities. Integration availability, trigger conditions, authorization and testing cadence are defined for the engagement.
- Match published CVEs against your configured technology inventory
- Auto-triggered scans when new ports, services, or config changes are detected
- Push alerts to Slack, PagerDuty, or any webhook for instant team visibility
CVE-2024-3400 matched2m ago
PAN-OS Command Injection on fw-edge.demo.test
New port 8443 discovered6m ago
api.demo.test: Kubernetes Dashboard v2.7.0
Config drift detected14m ago
auth.demo.test: LDAP bind settings changed
New PR merged to mainjust now
SWARM pentest triggered automatically
How It Works
A defined workflow from authorized scope to findings.
Scope confirmed
Define Your Scope
Enter a domain, IP range, or API endpoint. SWARM agents begin reconnaissance immediately. No infrastructure changes needed.
Exploit Verified
Test and Review Findings
Within the authorized scope, agents can investigate multi-step attack paths. Findings include the available evidence and reproduction detail for review.
Review and Remediate
Review reported findings, evidence, and remediation guidance. Any framework mapping or retest is agreed as part of the engagement scope.
01
Foundation
Threat-model driven. Architecture, trust boundaries and invariants.
02
Threat generation
50–80 prioritized attack hypotheses.
03
Deduplication
~45% of overlapping findings removed.
04
Validation
Confirmed or refuted with reproducible proof.
05
Agentic deep dive
Agents chase multi-step attack chains.
06
Remediation
Automated fixes delivered, then re-tested.
↻ Retesting can be configured for agreed changes
New PR merged·New CVE disclosed·New open port detected
Evidence contract
Define proof before the agent runs.
Every engagement agrees in advance what a valid outcome looks like, so agentic testing stays measurable, bounded, and useful to engineering and risk owners.
Exploitability
A security-relevant effect is demonstrated in the authorized target environment, not inferred from a version string or pattern match.
Reproducibility
The trace preserves the hypothesis, actions, responses, target context, and grader or verification outcome.
Scope compliance
Authorization, target boundaries, tool permissions, rate limits, and high-impact approvals are explicit before execution.
Fix verification
The same attack path or a defined regression test is re-run after remediation, with the result recorded for the risk owner.
The FailSafe perspective
Turn the control into a question you can test.
Explore how active testing, reproduced findings and enterprise-owned inference can help your team make a better security decision.
Keep the evidence through the handoff
Connect a reproduced finding to its owner, reviewed change and retest.
Read the analysis →Compare active-validation platforms
Evaluate evidence, engineering closure and the inference boundary with the same authorized scope.
Read the analysis →Show progress the risk owner can review
Keep verified outcomes, unresolved exposure and assessment coverage visible together.
Read the analysis →Frequently Asked Questions
For an agreed connected engagement, FailSafe takes the workflow from agent deployment and threat modeling through active testing, reproduction of findings, ITSM handoff and agent-generated remediation pull requests within 48 hours of full access and integration readiness. Your team reviews and merges changes and controls production rollout. Confirm the scope and prerequisites with us; the first-pentest promotion separately includes its report window and remediation retesting.
Yes. A fully local FailSafe deployment can keep model inference, source code, prompts, traces and assessment evidence inside your enterprise environment, with no external model calls or cloud fallback in that configuration. We agree hosting, egress restrictions, telemetry, updates and support access as part of deployment design. Regional data storage alone does not provide this control.
FailSafe develops and security-post-trains its GlassBreak cyber models from an open-weights base. Combined with SWARM’s active testing workflow, they support threat modeling, attack-path investigation and reproducible evidence. Enterprise teams can evaluate the model and execution workflow together and choose customer-controlled inference.
Traditional penetration tests are scoped point-in-time assessments. SWARM is an agentic pentesting platform for repeatable testing of authorized applications and infrastructure. The coverage, schedule, validation process, and reporting depend on configuration and engagement scope. It can complement a human-led assessment, while specialized methods may still require expert testers.
Vulnerability scanners and agentic testing platforms can use different checks and methods. SWARM is designed for authorized, multi-step security testing. When reviewing results, examine the test evidence, scope, reproducibility, impact, and review process for each finding.
A penetration testing report can document scope, test dates, methods, findings, and remediation for a customer's security program. Whether that evidence is relevant or sufficient depends on the system, the customer's requirements, and the auditor or certification body's judgment. SWARM does not issue SOC 2 reports or ISO certifications.
SWARM can support repeatable testing of authorized software and cloud environments. It does not cover every method or context of a manual penetration test. Confirm the assets, techniques, human review, and exclusions required for your assessment.
Yes. SWARM is built for channel delivery. MSSPs and system integrators can deploy SWARM under their own brand with multi-tenant management, elastic licensing, and dedicated support. Contact us for partner program details.
Contact FailSafe to discuss your assets, authorization, testing goals, and scope. The team can confirm the appropriate workflow and delivery expectations for the assessment.
See what attackers see. Fix it before they get there.
Explore agentic penetration testing for your authorized assets. Review scope, evidence, and workflow with our team.
Read the agentic pentesting guideChoose how you work
Run SWARM yourself, or let our team operate it.
Your team runs the platform
Set authorized targets, scope and testing cadence. Review reproduced findings and connect the results to your engineering workflow. Choose the hosting and inference model your security requirements call for.
Plan platform accessOur offensive team runs the engagement
FailSafe scopes and operates the assessment, reviews the findings and delivers prioritized evidence and remediation guidance. A managed service can suit teams that need offensive testing without building an internal function.
Discuss managed deliveryConnect delivery through the agreed CI/CD, ticketing, SIEM, ChatOps, API or webhook workflow. Integration availability, access and the review process are confirmed for your engagement.
Sources and scope
What supports this page
SWARM is the testing workflow; GlassBreak is FailSafe’s cybersecurity model research. Deployment, inference, integrations and assessment coverage are agreed per configuration. A benchmark result does not establish production coverage.
By FailSafe Product. Editorial update: .
Agent safety
Review what constrains the next action.
Explore SWARM’s execution gate, Safe and Cyber modes, ephemeral agent runtimes and the target-isolation requirements for deeper validation.
Explore the Trust Center safeguards →The FailSafe workflow
48 hours from vulnerability scanning to code remediation.
Move from a deployed agent to a threat model, validated findings, ITSM handoff and agent-generated remediation PRs in one connected workflow.
01
Deploy and model the threat
Agents map the authorized application, identities and trust boundaries, then build a threat model to guide the assessment.
02
Test real attack paths
SWARM actively investigates how weaknesses can be used across application flows, APIs, internal systems and AI tools.
03
Reproduce before escalating
Validate the finding and preserve reproducible evidence. Give engineers a demonstrated failure to work on and reduce time spent chasing false positives.
04
Put the work in your ITSM queue
Send validated issues, impact and remediation context into your connected ITSM workflow so the right team can take ownership.
05
Open the remediation PR
Agents propose code changes in pull requests for your engineers to review. After a fix is applied, retest the original path and record the result.
The 48-hour workflow starts with full access, agreed scope and connected repository and ITSM integrations. Your team controls PR review, merge and production rollout. Remediation beyond that scope is planned with you. The first-pentest promotion has its own report and retest deliverables.
For enterprise buyers
Make the case for FailSafe.
See how active testing, FailSafe-trained cyber models and sovereign inference work together for your security and engineering teams.
Why choose FailSafe over XBOW?
Compare the complete attack-to-remediation workflow, our cyber models and fully local inference.
Read the guide →FailSafe or Pentera?
See where threat-led application testing, reproducible findings and code remediation fit your program.
Read the guide →FailSafe or Horizon3.ai?
Connect internal testing with application and AI risk, enterprise-owned inference and engineering handoff.
Read the guide →Own your inferencing
Understand how FailSafe can keep model processing, code and evidence inside your enterprise environment.
Read the guide →Why our cyber models matter
Explore the role of security post-training, SWARM execution and evidence in an enterprise assessment.
Read the guide →From demonstrated weakness to reviewed fix
Follow a validated attack path into an ITSM issue, a remediation PR and a retest.
Read the guide →One agentic security lab
Red teaming across the systems you depend on.
FailSafe’s product lines organize our agentic red-teaming and pentesting work by security surface. We connect threat modeling, authorized assessment, evidence and remediation follow-up, with methods suited to each environment.
Applications and infrastructure
SWARM
Agentic penetration testing for web and mobile applications, APIs, cloud, networks and AI-enabled software.
From application behavior to reproduced findings and remediation.
Explore SWARM →Robotics and operational systems
HIVE
Agentic red teaming for the software control plane of OT, robots, embodied AI, C-UAS platforms and autonomous fleets.
From authorized mission to control-plane action and operational evidence.
Explore HIVE →Cryptographic trust
COCOON
Post-quantum resilience assessment and R&D for cryptographic dependencies, confidentiality, signing trust and migration priorities.
From cryptographic inventory to evidence-based resilience priorities.
Explore COCOON →