Smart Contract Audit in Minutes, Not Months: Automated Security for Blockchain Developers
A traditional smart contract audit typically costs $50,000-150,000 and takes 4-8 weeks. By the time you get results, the market has moved, competitors have shipped, and your treasury has bled dry waiting.
In 2024 alone, $2.36 billion was lost to smart contract exploits. Most victims had one thing in common: they couldn’t afford (or couldn’t wait for) a proper security audit. Or worse, they paid for an audit, but in the end still got hacked.
FailSafe Swarm is automated smart contract security that delivers audit-quality vulnerability detection in minutes, not months. And at a fraction of the price.
The Smart Contract Audit Problem
Traditional Audits Are Broken
| Pain Point | Reality |
|---|---|
| Cost | $50K-150K+ for complex protocols |
| Timeline | 2-8 weeks minimum, often delayed |
| Availability | Top firms booked 6+ months out |
| Iteration | Each code change = new audit cycle |
| Accessibility | Enterprise sales process, NDAs, legal |
If you’re a solo developer, small team, or bootstrapped startup, you’re priced out of security. That’s systemic failure.
What Happens Without Audits
Projects that skip security reviews face predictable outcomes:
- Rug pull accusations – Even legitimate projects get labeled scams without audit badges
- Insurance rejection – Nexus Mutual, Sherlock won’t cover unaudited protocols
- VC hesitation – Investors ask “who audited this?” in every due diligence
- User distrust – “No audit = no ape” is DeFi common sense
- Exploits – 89% of smart contracts contain vulnerabilities according to industry research
The market created a two-tier system: audited protocols that get trust, and everyone else.
Enter Automated Smart Contract Security
FailSafe Swarm uses AI-powered analysis to detect vulnerabilities at machine speed. It’s not a replacement for manual audits on critical infrastructure but rather, democratization of the audit process through smarter, more hard working LLM agents.
How Swarm Works
Step 1: Submit Code- Upload GitHub repo, or- Provide deployed contract addressStep 2: Automated Analysis- Static analysis (Slither, custom rules)- Symbolic execution- AI hypothesis generation- Attack path simulation- Threat Modelling and Stocastic ProofsStep 3: Results in Minutes/Hours- Vulnerability report (Critical → Informational)- Exploit scenarios- Remediation guidance- Severity scoring
What Swarm Catches
| Vulnerability Class | Detection |
|---|---|
| Reentrancy | ✓ |
| Access control flaws | ✓ |
| Integer overflow/underflow | ✓ |
| Flash loan attack vectors | ✓ |
| Oracle manipulation | ✓ |
| Front-running opportunities | ✓ |
| Unchecked external calls | ✓ |
| Logic errors | ✓ |
| Gas optimization issues | ✓ |
| Centralization risks | ✓ |
In 2024, access control flaws alone caused $953M in losses. Swarm flags these automatically.
Instant Smart Contract Audit: Real Example
Let’s audit a contract deployed on Base:
Contract: 0x7b67eabefd6f81bab24b4ef9acc78f2659d8ee09Network: BaseAnalysis Time: 4 minutes 32 secondsRESULTS:━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━Critical: 0High: 1Medium: 3Low: 7Informational: 12━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━HIGH SEVERITY:[H-01] Unprotected initialize() function- File: src/Vault.sol:45- Impact: Anyone can re-initialize and change owner- Fix: Add initializer modifier or initialized flagMEDIUM SEVERITY:[M-01] Missing slippage protection in swap()- File: src/Router.sol:112- Impact: Users vulnerable to sandwich attacks- Fix: Add minAmountOut parameter[M-02] Centralized admin can pause indefinitely- File: src/Core.sol:78- Impact: Single point of failure- Fix: Add timelock or governance[M-03] No withdrawal delay for large amounts- File: src/Vault.sol:203- Impact: Flash loan attack surface- Fix: Implement withdrawal queue for amounts > threshold
4 minutes. That same analysis would take a human auditor 1.5 days minimum.
When to Use Automated vs. Manual Audits
Swarm isn’t trying to replace Zellic or Trail of Bits. It’s serving different needs:
| Scenario | Automated (Swarm) | Manual Audit |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-launch sanity check | ✓ Best choice | Overkill |
| CI/CD security gate | ✓ Best choice | Too slow |
| Hackathon project | ✓ Best choice | Unavailable |
| < $1M TVL protocol | ✓ Best choice | Often unaffordable |
| $1-10M TVL protocol | ✓ First pass | ✓ Follow-up on criticals |
| > $10M TVL protocol | ✓ Continuous monitoring | ✓ Required |
| Novel cryptographic code | Partial coverage | ✓ Required |
| Critical bridge/L2 | Partial coverage | ✓ Required |
The smart approach: Run Swarm first to catch obvious issues, then use manual audits for what remains. You’ll get faster turnaround and lower costs.
Cheap Smart Contract Audit: Cost Comparison
| Service | Price | Timeline | What You Get |
|---|---|---|---|
| FailSafe Swarm | Free Tier available | Minutes | Automated vulnerability scan |
| Sherlock Contest | $15K-50K | 2-4 weeks | Competitive audit + coverage |
| OpenZeppelin | $50K-200K | 6-12 weeks | Manual review + report |
| CertiK | $50K-150K | 4-8 weeks | Manual review + Skynet badge |
| Trail of Bits | $100K-500K | 3-6 months | Elite manual review |
For a bootstrapped team, spending $100K on security before product-market fit is financial suicide. Swarm attempts to find a hybrid solution between security (when projects are nascent) + manual audits when protoocols can afford the costs. And FailSafe can serve the entire spectrum of needs.
Blockchain Security API for CI/CD
Integrate automated security scanning into your development workflow:
# .github/workflows/security.ymlname: Smart Contract Security Scanon: push: branches: [main, develop] pull_request: branches: [main]jobs: security-scan: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Run FailSafe Swarm Analysis uses: failsafe/swarm-action@v1 with: project-path: ./contracts fail-on: high # Fail CI if high/critical found - name: Upload Security Report uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: swarm-report path: ./swarm-results/
Every PR gets scanned. No criticals merge to main. Security becomes a gate, not an afterthought.
API Integration
import requestsdef scan_contract(github_url: str) -> dict: """Automated smart contract security scan via Swarm API""" response = requests.post( "https://api.failsafe.com/swarm/v1/scan", json={ "github_url": github_url, "run_agent": True, "hypothesis_provider": "opus" } ) return response.json()# Queue a security scanresult = scan_contract("https://github.com/myproject/defi-protocol")print(f"Job ID: {result['job_id']}")print(f"Dashboard: {result['dashboard_url']}")# Results available in minutes, not weeks
The blockchain security API returns:
- Vulnerability list with severity ratings
- Affected code locations
- Exploitation scenarios
- Remediation recommendations
- Confidence scores
Crypto Security for Developers: Best Practices
Pre-Launch Checklist
Before deploying any smart contract:
□ Run automated security scan (Swarm)□ Fix all Critical and High findings□ Review Medium findings (fix or document acceptance)□ Test on forked mainnet with attack scenarios□ Set up monitoring for post-deployment□ Document known limitations and trust assumptions□ Consider manual audit for novel/high-value code
Continuous Security
Security isn’t a one-time audit. It’s a process:
Development → Swarm scan on every PRStaging → Full Swarm analysis before testnetPre-launch → Manual audit for final reviewPost-launch → Monitoring + bug bountyUpgrades → Swarm scan on every change
Common Mistakes We See
- “We’ll audit after launch” – Exploits don’t wait for your roadmap
- “Tests pass, so it’s secure” – Tests check expected behavior, not attack vectors
- “We copied from audited code” – Integration bugs exist even with safe components
- “It’s upgradeable, we can fix later” – Attackers exploit before you can upgrade
- “Low TVL = low risk” – Attackers farm small protocols to test exploits
DeFi Security Landscape in 2025
The numbers are stark:
- $2.36B lost in 2024 across 760 incidents
- $2.29B lost in H1 2025 alone (344 incidents)
- 89% of smart contracts contain vulnerabilities
- Access control flaws caused $953M in losses
- 20% of DeFi protocols vulnerable to front-running
The security industry response? Raise prices and extend timelines.
Our response: Make automated smart contract security accessible to everyone.
Swarm vs. Other Automated Tools
| Tool | Approach | Coverage | Integration |
|---|---|---|---|
| FailSafe Swarm | AI + Static + Stochastic | Broad | API, CI/CD, GitHub |
| Slither | Static analysis | Good | CLI |
| Mythril | Symbolic execution | Deep but slow | CLI |
| Securify | Pattern matching | Limited | CLI |
| Nethermind AuditAgent | AI-assisted | Pre-audit | Web |
Swarm combines multiple analysis approaches and adds AI-powered hypothesis generation to find business logic vulnerabilities that pure static analysis misses.
Getting Started
Option 1: Scan a GitHub Repo
curl -X POST https://api.failsafe.com/swarm/v1/github \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "github_url": "https://github.com/your-org/your-contracts", "run_agent": true }'
Option 2: Scan a Deployed Contract
curl -X POST https://api.failsafe.com/swarm/v1/contract \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "address": "0x1234...", "network": "ethereum", "project_name": "MyProtocol" }'
Option 3: Use the Dashboard
- Go to getfailsafe.com/swarm
- Connect GitHub or paste contract address
- Click “Scan”
- Get results in minutes/hours
The Future of Smart Contract Audits
Manual audits aren’t going away. For novel cryptographic implementations, complex cross-chain bridges, and protocols holding billions, human expertise remains essential.
But the current model, where security is a luxury good: has failed. $2B+ stolen annually is proof.
Automated smart contract security democratizes protection. It’s not either/or. It’s:
- Swarm for velocity – Catch 80% of issues in minutes
- Manual audits for depth – Expert review on what matters
- Continuous monitoring – Detect issues post-deployment
Security should scale with your protocol, not gate it.
Try Swarm Free
Your smart contracts deserve better than “we’ll audit it later.”
First scan free. Results in minutes.
FailSafe builds security tools for the builders who can’t wait 6 months and spend $100K to find out their code has bugs. Because security shouldn’t require VC backing.
Related:
Related Articles

dbook Smart Contract Audit
dbook is a fully on-chain EVM orderbook exchange designed to deliver decentralized trading with high performance, gas efficiency, and self-custody. The protocol...

Aegis JUSD Smart Contract Audit
Aegis is a multichain stablecoin protocol powering JUSD and YUSD, featuring minting, redemption, staking vaults, rewards distribution, and cross-chain bridging ...

The Moats V3 Smart Contract Audit
The Moats are a flexible staking and rewards protocol enabling project teams to configure easy governance participation, time-weighted incentives, and multi-tok...
Ready to secure your project?
Get in touch with our security experts for a comprehensive audit.
Contact Us