Back to blog

The Future of Smart Contract Audits

7 min read

Smart Contract Audit in Minutes, Not Months: Automated Security for Blockchain Developers


A traditional smart contract audit typically costs $50,000-150,000 and takes 4-8 weeks. By the time you get results, the market has moved, competitors have shipped, and your treasury has bled dry waiting.

In 2024 alone, $2.36 billion was lost to smart contract exploits. Most victims had one thing in common: they couldn’t afford (or couldn’t wait for) a proper security audit. Or worse, they paid for an audit, but in the end still got hacked.

FailSafe Swarm is automated smart contract security that delivers audit-quality vulnerability detection in minutes, not months. And at a fraction of the price.

The Smart Contract Audit Problem

Traditional Audits Are Broken

Pain PointReality
Cost$50K-150K+ for complex protocols
Timeline2-8 weeks minimum, often delayed
AvailabilityTop firms booked 6+ months out
IterationEach code change = new audit cycle
AccessibilityEnterprise sales process, NDAs, legal

If you’re a solo developer, small team, or bootstrapped startup, you’re priced out of security. That’s systemic failure.

What Happens Without Audits

Projects that skip security reviews face predictable outcomes:

  • Rug pull accusations – Even legitimate projects get labeled scams without audit badges
  • Insurance rejection – Nexus Mutual, Sherlock won’t cover unaudited protocols
  • VC hesitation – Investors ask “who audited this?” in every due diligence
  • User distrust – “No audit = no ape” is DeFi common sense
  • Exploits – 89% of smart contracts contain vulnerabilities according to industry research

The market created a two-tier system: audited protocols that get trust, and everyone else.

Enter Automated Smart Contract Security

FailSafe Swarm uses AI-powered analysis to detect vulnerabilities at machine speed. It’s not a replacement for manual audits on critical infrastructure but rather, democratization of the audit process through smarter, more hard working LLM agents.

How Swarm Works

Step 1: Submit Code
- Upload GitHub repo, or
- Provide deployed contract address
Step 2: Automated Analysis
- Static analysis (Slither, custom rules)
- Symbolic execution
- AI hypothesis generation
- Attack path simulation
- Threat Modelling and Stocastic Proofs
Step 3: Results in Minutes/Hours
- Vulnerability report (Critical → Informational)
- Exploit scenarios
- Remediation guidance
- Severity scoring

What Swarm Catches

Vulnerability ClassDetection
Reentrancy
Access control flaws
Integer overflow/underflow
Flash loan attack vectors
Oracle manipulation
Front-running opportunities
Unchecked external calls
Logic errors
Gas optimization issues
Centralization risks

In 2024, access control flaws alone caused $953M in losses. Swarm flags these automatically.

Instant Smart Contract Audit: Real Example

Let’s audit a contract deployed on Base:

Contract: 0x7b67eabefd6f81bab24b4ef9acc78f2659d8ee09
Network: Base
Analysis Time: 4 minutes 32 seconds
RESULTS:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Critical: 0
High: 1
Medium: 3
Low: 7
Informational: 12
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
HIGH SEVERITY:
[H-01] Unprotected initialize() function
- File: src/Vault.sol:45
- Impact: Anyone can re-initialize and change owner
- Fix: Add initializer modifier or initialized flag
MEDIUM SEVERITY:
[M-01] Missing slippage protection in swap()
- File: src/Router.sol:112
- Impact: Users vulnerable to sandwich attacks
- Fix: Add minAmountOut parameter
[M-02] Centralized admin can pause indefinitely
- File: src/Core.sol:78
- Impact: Single point of failure
- Fix: Add timelock or governance
[M-03] No withdrawal delay for large amounts
- File: src/Vault.sol:203
- Impact: Flash loan attack surface
- Fix: Implement withdrawal queue for amounts > threshold

4 minutes. That same analysis would take a human auditor 1.5 days minimum.

When to Use Automated vs. Manual Audits

Swarm isn’t trying to replace Zellic or Trail of Bits. It’s serving different needs:

ScenarioAutomated (Swarm)Manual Audit
Pre-launch sanity check✓ Best choiceOverkill
CI/CD security gate✓ Best choiceToo slow
Hackathon project✓ Best choiceUnavailable
< $1M TVL protocol✓ Best choiceOften unaffordable
$1-10M TVL protocol✓ First pass✓ Follow-up on criticals
> $10M TVL protocol✓ Continuous monitoring✓ Required
Novel cryptographic codePartial coverage✓ Required
Critical bridge/L2Partial coverage✓ Required

The smart approach: Run Swarm first to catch obvious issues, then use manual audits for what remains. You’ll get faster turnaround and lower costs.

Cheap Smart Contract Audit: Cost Comparison

ServicePriceTimelineWhat You Get
FailSafe SwarmFree Tier availableMinutesAutomated vulnerability scan
Sherlock Contest$15K-50K2-4 weeksCompetitive audit + coverage
OpenZeppelin$50K-200K6-12 weeksManual review + report
CertiK$50K-150K4-8 weeksManual review + Skynet badge
Trail of Bits$100K-500K3-6 monthsElite manual review

For a bootstrapped team, spending $100K on security before product-market fit is financial suicide. Swarm attempts to find a hybrid solution between security (when projects are nascent) + manual audits when protoocols can afford the costs. And FailSafe can serve the entire spectrum of needs.

Blockchain Security API for CI/CD

Integrate automated security scanning into your development workflow:

# .github/workflows/security.yml
name: Smart Contract Security Scan
on:
push:
branches: [main, develop]
pull_request:
branches: [main]
jobs:
security-scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Run FailSafe Swarm Analysis
uses: failsafe/swarm-action@v1
with:
project-path: ./contracts
fail-on: high # Fail CI if high/critical found
- name: Upload Security Report
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: swarm-report
path: ./swarm-results/

Every PR gets scanned. No criticals merge to main. Security becomes a gate, not an afterthought.

API Integration

import requests
def scan_contract(github_url: str) -> dict:
"""Automated smart contract security scan via Swarm API"""
response = requests.post(
"https://api.failsafe.com/swarm/v1/scan",
json={
"github_url": github_url,
"run_agent": True,
"hypothesis_provider": "opus"
}
)
return response.json()
# Queue a security scan
result = scan_contract("https://github.com/myproject/defi-protocol")
print(f"Job ID: {result['job_id']}")
print(f"Dashboard: {result['dashboard_url']}")
# Results available in minutes, not weeks

The blockchain security API returns:

  • Vulnerability list with severity ratings
  • Affected code locations
  • Exploitation scenarios
  • Remediation recommendations
  • Confidence scores

Crypto Security for Developers: Best Practices

Pre-Launch Checklist

Before deploying any smart contract:

□ Run automated security scan (Swarm)
□ Fix all Critical and High findings
□ Review Medium findings (fix or document acceptance)
□ Test on forked mainnet with attack scenarios
□ Set up monitoring for post-deployment
□ Document known limitations and trust assumptions
□ Consider manual audit for novel/high-value code

Continuous Security

Security isn’t a one-time audit. It’s a process:

Development → Swarm scan on every PR
Staging → Full Swarm analysis before testnet
Pre-launch → Manual audit for final review
Post-launch → Monitoring + bug bounty
Upgrades → Swarm scan on every change

Common Mistakes We See

  1. “We’ll audit after launch” – Exploits don’t wait for your roadmap
  2. “Tests pass, so it’s secure” – Tests check expected behavior, not attack vectors
  3. “We copied from audited code” – Integration bugs exist even with safe components
  4. “It’s upgradeable, we can fix later” – Attackers exploit before you can upgrade
  5. “Low TVL = low risk” – Attackers farm small protocols to test exploits

DeFi Security Landscape in 2025

The numbers are stark:

  • $2.36B lost in 2024 across 760 incidents
  • $2.29B lost in H1 2025 alone (344 incidents)
  • 89% of smart contracts contain vulnerabilities
  • Access control flaws caused $953M in losses
  • 20% of DeFi protocols vulnerable to front-running

The security industry response? Raise prices and extend timelines.

Our response: Make automated smart contract security accessible to everyone.

Swarm vs. Other Automated Tools

ToolApproachCoverageIntegration
FailSafe SwarmAI + Static + StochasticBroadAPI, CI/CD, GitHub
SlitherStatic analysisGoodCLI
MythrilSymbolic executionDeep but slowCLI
SecurifyPattern matchingLimitedCLI
Nethermind AuditAgentAI-assistedPre-auditWeb

Swarm combines multiple analysis approaches and adds AI-powered hypothesis generation to find business logic vulnerabilities that pure static analysis misses.

Getting Started

Option 1: Scan a GitHub Repo

curl -X POST https://api.failsafe.com/swarm/v1/github \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"github_url": "https://github.com/your-org/your-contracts",
"run_agent": true
}'

Option 2: Scan a Deployed Contract

curl -X POST https://api.failsafe.com/swarm/v1/contract \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"address": "0x1234...",
"network": "ethereum",
"project_name": "MyProtocol"
}'

Option 3: Use the Dashboard

  1. Go to getfailsafe.com/swarm
  2. Connect GitHub or paste contract address
  3. Click “Scan”
  4. Get results in minutes/hours

The Future of Smart Contract Audits

Manual audits aren’t going away. For novel cryptographic implementations, complex cross-chain bridges, and protocols holding billions, human expertise remains essential.

But the current model, where security is a luxury good: has failed. $2B+ stolen annually is proof.

Automated smart contract security democratizes protection. It’s not either/or. It’s:

  • Swarm for velocity – Catch 80% of issues in minutes
  • Manual audits for depth – Expert review on what matters
  • Continuous monitoring – Detect issues post-deployment

Security should scale with your protocol, not gate it.


Try Swarm Free

Your smart contracts deserve better than “we’ll audit it later.”

Contact Us Today! →

First scan free. Results in minutes.


FailSafe builds security tools for the builders who can’t wait 6 months and spend $100K to find out their code has bugs. Because security shouldn’t require VC backing.

Related:

Ready to secure your project?

Get in touch with our security experts for a comprehensive audit.

Contact Us