The Hidden Risks of Multisig Wallets: Lessons from Bybit, 0xInfini, and How to Stay Secure

Multisig Security in the Spotlight

In recent months, the security of multisig wallets has come under intense scrutiny as high-profile breaches continue to expose critical vulnerabilities. Once considered a robust security measure, multisig wallets have proven susceptible to increasingly sophisticated attack vectors. The recent Bybit and 0xInfini breaches are stark reminders that traditional multisig setups alone are insufficient to safeguard digital assets.

Bybit recently suffered a $1.5 billion exploit resulting from a private key compromise. Instead of exploiting traditional smart contract vulnerabilities, attackers took control of authorized signers, allowing them to manipulate multisig treasury approvals. The core issue was a lack of risk-based transaction validation, enabling malicious approvals to go unchecked.

Similarly, 0xInfini, a crypto payments provider, experienced a significant breach leading to $50 million in losses. Attackers exploited weaknesses in access control, likely leveraging stolen or compromised signer keys. The attack underscores the fact that even requiring multiple signatures for transaction approval does not inherently protect against key theft or unauthorized access.

These incidents highlight a fundamental flaw in standard multisig implementations: they focus on requiring multiple approvals but lack mechanisms for verifying the legitimacy of transactions or preventing unauthorized access at a deeper level. Attackers have adapted, employing techniques such as phishing, device compromise, and advanced social engineering to bypass security barriers.

Understanding Multisig Security Risks

Multisig wallets require multiple private key holders to authorize transactions, adding an additional layer of security compared to single-signature wallets. However, recent breaches have demonstrated that they are still vulnerable to specific attack vectors:

• Signer Key Theft: If attackers gain control of even a subset of signers, they can execute unauthorized transactions without triggering alarms.
• Lack of Contextual Verification: Most multisig setups verify that the required number of signers approved a transaction but fail to confirm whether the transaction itself is legitimate.
• Geographical Exploits: Standard multisig wallets lack geofencing or IP intelligence to block transactions initiated from high-risk locations.
• Blind Approvals: Signers frequently approve transactions without thoroughly reviewing their contents, increasing the risk of malicious payloads being executed.

Multisig security is not just about requiring multiple approvals; it must also incorporate mechanisms to verify transaction integrity, detect anomalies, and prevent unauthorized approvals.

Strengthening Multisig Security

To address these challenges, multisig implementations must be augmented with additional security measures. The following best practices can significantly enhance protection against unauthorized transactions and security breaches:

• Signer Monitoring & Risk Analytics: Continuously evaluate signer behavior, flagging anomalies such as approvals from unrecognized devices or locations.
• Device & IP Intelligence: Restrict transactions based on IP addresses and geolocation data to prevent approvals from unauthorized regions.
• Transaction Simulations & Attestations: Require signers to validate transaction details through simulated executions before granting approval, reducing the likelihood of blind signing.
• Time-Based Approvals: Implement delay mechanisms for high-value transactions, allowing additional time for review and rollback if necessary.
• Enforce Custom Policies: Establish role-based permissions, spending limits, and whitelists to control transaction execution and reduce exposure.
• Isolate Signing Devices: Use a dedicated, air-gapped device solely for signing transactions. This device should never be used for general browsing, email, or other non-transaction activities, minimizing exposure to malware and phishing attacks.

By adopting these measures, organizations can significantly reduce their attack surface and mitigate the risk of unauthorized fund movement.

Introducing FailSafe Guard: Enhanced Protection for Multisig Wallets

Traditional multisig security measures, while effective to an extent, are no longer sufficient in an environment where attackers have evolved their methods. FailSafe’s Guard product enhances multisig security by incorporating on-chain access control and context-aware transaction verification to mitigate risks before they escalate.

Key Features of Guard

• Account Takeover Protection: Even if a key is compromised, Guard requires additional on-chain attestations before allowing high-risk transactions.
• Geofencing & Device Intelligence: Transactions originating from suspicious locations or unrecognized devices are automatically blocked.
• Configurable Policies: Users can enforce custom rules such as time-based constraints, transaction limits, and whitelisted signers.
• Real-Time Risk Analysis: Guard evaluates transaction security dynamically, identifying and preventing potential anomalies before execution.

Next Steps to Secure Your Multisig Wallet

FailSafe is offering a complimentary security review along with a two-week free trial of Guard for teams looking to strengthen their multisig security posture.

Secure your multisig setup before the next exploit occurs.

🛡️Sign up for your free security review today